Important Ladies’s Well being Assets: The place to Discover Proof-Based mostly Data

Please word: On this article, the time period ‘ladies’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identity.

Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being info shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.

In a political local weather the place ladies’s our bodies are always below hearth, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.

These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re very important assets on every part from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and scientific trial range. The form of info that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable decisions about their our bodies.

And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little clarification and 0 accountability. If that seems like a conflict on ladies, properly… you’re not unsuitable.

When politics begins dictating what well being info we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to struggle again. Meaning getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to impartial, science-backed women’s health resources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t should find out about our personal rattling our bodies.

Why Authorities-Equipped Well being Data is Disappearing

For many years, federal well being companies just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA have been go-to sources for reliable medical info. However in latest months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: hundreds of pages of girls’s well being content material have quietly vanished.

This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.

Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed essentially the most.

What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues

Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness info is crucial to the well-being of girls. But the U.S. authorities has just lately modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages^1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steerage.

These deletions have an effect on assets from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This contains very important public well being info on matters resembling HIV and sexually transmitted illnesses, contraceptive utilization and security, scientific trial range, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.^1,2,3,4.

Who This Impacts Most

The suppression of this info disproportionately impacts ladies, minorities, and different marginalized people.

With out these assets, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face vital challenges in making knowledgeable choices about therapy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.

Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply limit entry to data—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.

[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]

Fortuitously, there are advocates on the market working to archive this info and make it obtainable to the general public⁵. This article accommodates an inventory of those recovered assets.

The Political Undermining of Public Well being

Whereas the transition of presidency from one get together to a different shouldn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness info, it has. This alarming pattern highlights the pressing want for impartial, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being assets.

The Position of Advocacy Organizations

Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance ladies’s well being via coverage, schooling, and science.

For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Sex as a Biological Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a vital step in making certain that illnesses, remedies, and medical interventions are researched with ladies’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.

The well being wants of girls change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years via menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed assets much more vital.

Trusted, Proof-Based mostly Ladies’s Well being Assets

Under is a curated listing of evidence-based, non-governmental assets. These organizations present science-backed steerage tailor-made to the distinctive well being considerations of girls of their reproductive years, through the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By in search of out and sharing these assets, we will collectively safeguard entry to very important well being data and be certain that all ladies have the knowledge they should thrive at each stage of life.

Teen/Reproductive Years: 

Reproductive Health Access Project
Trains and helps major care clinicians to develop entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Presents free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person schooling supplies and advocates for fairness in scientific coaching and care.

Perimenopause/Menopause:

The North American Menopause Society
A number one impartial group providing evidence-based info on menopause and midlife ladies’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.

A number of Life Levels:

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed ladies’s well being info. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an energetic position of their care.

Planned Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and schooling. Advocates for reasonably priced, high-quality providers and is the biggest supplier of intercourse schooling within the U.S.

Our Bodies Ourselves
Presents rigorously vetted well being and sexuality info that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of girls and gender-expansive people.

Healthy Women
Targeted on ladies aged 35 to 64, this group gives medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome getting old and empowered self-advocacy.

Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Women’s Mental Health: Reproductive Psychiatry Resource & Information Center
Presents reproductive psychiatry assets throughout life phases, with specialised assist for BIPOC people in search of culturally aligned care.

Center for Science in the Public Interest
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being via diet, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.

Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered

In a time when entry to reliable well being info is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply vital—it’s a type of resistance. Each individual deserves science-backed, inclusive assets that assist knowledgeable decisions, not political agendas.

So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Assist the organizations doing the exhausting work to maintain this info alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t value preventing for. As a result of it’s. At all times. —Karin

References

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
2. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
3. https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
4. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
5. https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
6. https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says